![]() I like the idea of scanning a slide once and then editing it later. If you don't want to use the RAW editing adjustment tools and instead do everything manually then I don't know if it woudl matter. When I open a raw DNG file in Photoshop it brings up the nice RAW editing adjustment tool. However, when you open a raw TIFF in a photo editing software I don't think it "knows" it's raw- you just get a file with no curve applied. Well technically the output between the two files is probably the same. For me, I would just re-scan, but what do I know :pÄomaz, have you seen any difference between Vuescan's (i) raw TIFF files and (ii) raw DNG files? if you are a Vuescan expert and/or don't have Photoshop, and you feel like you want multiple interpretations of a single scan without having to re-scan, then perhaps Vuescan RAWs are a good fit. So, in my opinion, Photoshop is much easier to use than Vuescan to do after-scan adjustments. This gives me a pretty neutral scan that cleans up nicely in Photoshop with levels and curves, and I save as a PSD with layers and I have a good base to make JPEGs from. ![]() ![]() 75, and do the advanced workflow (from the vuescan manual) so that I'm scanning down to the base+fog(+base color if color neg), and I set the white balance. So, I just scan in TIFF and set my curve at. It kind of open in Adobe Camera Raw, but it's all messed up and doesn't really work well as it's not a true "raw" file in the same sense as a DSLR raw file is. ![]() As I understand it, Vuescan can save as the DNG (Their "raw") and then re-scan it later using different curves, adjustments, etc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |